Referat Vietnam War
Mai jos puteti citi fragmente din
Referat Vietnam War si de asemenea puteti face
Download Referat Vietnam warCiteste fragmente din Referat Vietnam War
Vietnam War –Razboiul din Vietnam
I
INTRODUCTION
Vietnam War, military struggle fought in Vietnam from 1959 to 1975,
involving the North Vietnamese and the National Liberation Front (NLF)
in conflict with United States forces and the South Vietnamese army.
From 1946 until 1954, the Vietnamese had struggled for their
independence from France during the First Indochina War. At the end of
this war, the country was temporarily divided into North and South
Vietnam. North Vietnam came under the control of the Vietnamese
Communists who had opposed France and who aimed for a unified Vietnam
under Communist rule. The South was controlled by Vietnamese who had
collaborated with the French.
The United States became involved in Vietnam because it believed that
if all of the country fell under a Communist government, Communism would
spread throughout Southeast Asia and beyond. This belief was known as
the “domino theory.†The U.S. government, therefore, supported the
South Vietnamese government. This government’s repressive policies led
to rebellion in the South, and the NLF was formed as an opposition group
with close ties to North Vietnam.
In 1965 the United States sent in troops to prevent the South
Vietnamese government from collapsing. Ultimately, however, the United
States failed to achieve its goal, and in 1975 Vietnam was reunified
under Communist control; in 1976 it officially became the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam. During the conflict, approximately 3 to 4 million
Vietnamese on both sides were killed, in addition to another 1.5 to 2
million Lao and Cambodians who were drawn into the war. More than 58,000
Americans lost their lives.
II
BACKGROUND
From the 1880s until World War II (1939-1945), France governed
Vietnam as part of French Indochina, which also included Cambodia and
Laos. The country was under the nominal control of an emperor, Bao Dai.
In 1940 Japanese troops invaded and occupied French Indochina. In
December of that year, Vietnamese nationalists established the League
for the Independence of Vietnam, or Viet Minh, seeing the turmoil of the
war as an opportunity for resistance to French colonial rule.
The United States demanded that Japan leave Indochina, warning of
military action. The Viet Minh began guerrilla warfare against Japan and
entered an effective alliance with the United States. Viet Minh troops
rescued downed U.S. pilots, located Japanese prison camps, helped U.S.
prisoners to escape, and provided valuable intelligence to the Office of
Strategic Services (OSS), the forerunner of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA). Ho Chi Minh, the principal leader of the Viet Minh, was
even made a special OSS agent.
When the Japanese signed their formal surrender on September 2, 1945,
Ho used the occasion to declare the independence of Vietnam, which he
called the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (DRV). Emperor Bao Dai had
abdicated the throne a week earlier. The French, however, refused to
acknowledge Vietnam’s independence, and later that year drove the Viet
Minh into the north of the country.
Ho wrote eight letters to U.S. president Harry Truman, imploring him
to recognize Vietnam’s independence. Many OSS agents informed the U.S.
administration that despite being a Communist, Ho Chi Minh was not a
puppet of the Communist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) and
that he could potentially become a valued ally in Asia. Tensions between
the United States and the USSR had mounted after World War II, resulting
in the Cold War.
The foreign policy of the United States during the Cold War was
driven by a fear of the spread of Communism. Eastern Europe had fallen
under the domination of the Communist USSR, and China was ruled by
Communists. United States policymakers felt they could not afford to
lose Southeast Asia as well to the Communists. The United States
therefore condemned Ho Chi Minh as an agent of international Communism
and offered to assist the French in recapturing Vietnam.
In 1946 United States warships ferried elite French troops to Vietnam
where they quickly regained control of the major cities, including
Hanoi, Haiphong, ÃÂàNang, Hue, and Saigon (now Ho Chi Minh City),
while the Viet Minh controlled the countryside. The Viet Minh had only
2000 troops at the time Vietnam’s independence was declared, but
recruiting increased after the arrival of French troops. By the late
1940s, the Viet Minh had hundreds of thousands of soldiers and were
fighting the French to a draw. In 1949 the French set up a government to
rival Ho Chi Minh’s, installing Bao Dai as head of state.
In May 1954 the Viet Minh mounted a massive assault on the French
fortress at Dien Bien, in northwestern Vietnam. The Battle of Dien Bien
Phu resulted in perhaps the most humiliating defeat in French military
history. Already tired of the war, the French public forced their
government to reach a peace agreement at the Geneva Conference.
France asked the other world powers to help draw up a plan for French
withdrawal from the region and for the future of Vietnam. Meeting in
Geneva, Switzerland, from May 8 to July 21, 1954, diplomats from France,
the United Kingdom, the USSR, China, and the United States, as well as
representatives from Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia, drafted a set of
agreements called the Geneva Accords. These agreements provided for the
withdrawal of French troops to the south of Vietnam until they could be
safely removed from the country. Viet Minh forces moved into the north.
Vietnam was temporarily divided at the 17th parallel to allow for a
cooling-off period and for warring factions among the Vietnamese to
return to their native regions. Ho Chi Minh maintained control of North
Vietnam, or the DRV, while Emperor Bao Dai remained head of South
Vietnam.
Elections were to be held in 1956 throughout the north and south and
to be supervised by an International Control Commission that had been
appointed at Geneva and was made up of representatives from Canada,
Poland, and India. Following these elections, Vietnam was to be reunited
under the government chosen by popular vote. The United States refused
to sign the accords, because it did not want to allow the possibility of
Communist control over Vietnam. The U.S. government moved to establish
the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO), a regional alliance that
extended protection to South Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos in case of
Communist “subversion.†SEATO, which came into force in 1955, became
the mechanism by which Washington justified its support for South
Vietnam; this support eventually became direct involvement of U.S.
troops.
Also in 1955, the United States picked Ngo Dinh Diem to replace Bao
Dai as head of the anti-Communist regime in South Vietnam. With U.S.
encouragement, Diem refused to participate in the planned national
elections, which Ho Chi Minh and the Lao Dong, or Workers’ Party, were
favored to win. Instead, Diem held elections only in South Vietnam, an
action that violated the Geneva Accords.
Diem won the elections with 98.2 percent of the vote, but many
historians believe these elections were rigged, since 200,000 more
people voted in Saigon than were registered. Diem then declared South
Vietnam to be an independent nation called the Republic of Vietnam
(RVN), with Saigon as its capital. Vietnamese Communists and many
non-Communist Vietnamese nationalists saw the creation of the RVN as an
effort by the United States to interfere with the independence promised
at Geneva.
III
THE BEGINNING OF THE WAR: 1959-1965
The repressive measures of the Diem government eventually led to
increasingly organized opposition within South Vietnam. Diem’s
government represented a minority of Vietnamese who were mostly
businessmen, Roman Catholics, large landowners, and others who had
fought with the French against the Viet Minh. The United States
initially backed the South Vietnamese government with military advisers
and financial assistance, but more involvement was needed to keep it
from collapsing. The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution eventually gave President
Lyndon B. Johnson permission to escalate the war in Vietnam.
A
Rebellion in South Vietnam
When Vietnam was divided in 1954, many Viet Minh who had been born in
the southern part of the country returned to their native villages to
await the 1956 elections and the reunification of their nation. When the
elections did not take place as planned, these Viet Minh immediately
formed the core of opposition to Diem’s government and sought its
overthrow. The Viet Minh were greatly aided in their efforts to organize
resistance in the countryside by Diem’s own policies, which alienated
many peasants.
Beginning in 1955, the United States created the Army of the Republic
of Vietnam (ARVN) in South Vietnam. Using these troops, Diem took land
away from peasants and returned it to former landlords, reversing the
land redistribution program implemented by the Viet Minh. He also
forcibly moved many villagers from their ancestral lands to controlled
settlements in an attempt to prevent Communist activity, and he drafted
their sons into the ARVN.
Diem sought to discredit the Viet Minh by contemptuously referring to
them as “Viet Cong†(the Vietnamese equivalent of calling them
“Commiesâ€Â), yet their influence continued to grow. Most southern
Viet Minh were members of the Lao Dong and were still committed to its
program of national liberation, reunification of Vietnam, and
reconstruction of society along socialist principles. By the late 1950s
they were anxious to begin full-scale armed struggle against Diem but
were held in check by the northern branch of the party, which feared
that this would invite the entry of U.S. armed forces. By 1959, however,
opposition to Diem was so widespread in rural areas that the southern
Communists formed the National Liberation Front (NLF), and in 1960 the
North Vietnamese government gave its formal sanction to the
organization. The NLF began to train and equip guerrillas, known as the
People’s Liberation Armed Forces (PLAF).
Diem’s support was concentrated mainly in the cities. Although he
had been a nationalist opposed to French rule, he welcomed into his
government those Vietnamese who had collaborated with the French, and
many of these became ARVN officers. Catholics were a minority throughout
Vietnam, amounting to no more than 10 percent of the population, but
they predominated in government positions because Diem himself was
Catholic. Between 1954 and 1955, operatives paid by the CIA spread
rumors in northern Vietnam that Communists were going to launch a
persecution of Catholics, which caused nearly 1 million Catholics to
flee to the south. Their resettlement uprooted Buddhists who already
deeply resented Diem’s rule because of his severe discrimination
against them.
In May 1963 Buddhists began a series of demonstrations against Diem,
and the demonstrators were fired on by police. At least seven Buddhist
monks set themselves on fire to protest the repression. Diem dismissed
these suicides as publicity stunts and promptly arrested 1400 monks. He
then arrested thousands of high school and grade school students who
were involved in protests against the government. After this, Diem was
viewed as an embarrassment both by the United States and by many of his
own generals.
The Saigon government’s war against the NLF was also going badly. In
January 1963 an ARVN force of 2000 encountered a group of 350 NLF
soldiers at Ap Bac, a village south of Saigon in the Mekong River Delta.
The ARVN troops were equipped with jet fighters, helicopters, and
armored personnel carriers, while the NLF forces had only small arms.
Nonetheless, 61 ARVN soldiers were killed, as were three U.S. military
advisers. By contrast, the NLF forces lost only 12 men. Some U.S.
military advisers began to report that Saigon was losing the war, but
the official military and embassy press officers reported Ap Bac as a
significant ARVN victory. Despite this official account, a handful of
U.S. journalists began to report pessimistically about the future of
U.S. involvement in South Vietnam, which led to increasing public
concern.
President John F. Kennedy still believed that the ARVN could become
effective. Some of his advisers advocated the commitment of U.S. combat
forces, but Kennedy decided to try to increase support for the ARVN
among the people of Vietnam through counterinsurgency. United States
Special Forces (Green Berets) would work with ARVN troops directly in
the villages in an effort to match NLF political organizing and to win
over the South Vietnamese people.
To support the U.S. effort, the Diem government developed a
“strategic hamlet†program that was essentially an extension of
Diem’s earlier relocation practices. Aimed at cutting the links
between villagers and the NLF, the program removed peasants from their
traditional villages, often at gunpoint, and resettled them in new
hamlets fortified to keep the NLF out. Administration was left up to
Diem’s brother Nhu, a corrupt official who charged villagers for
building materials that had been donated by the United States. In many
cases peasants were forbidden to leave the hamlets, but many of the
young men quickly left anyway and joined the NLF. Young men who were
drafted into the ARVN often also worked secretly for the NLF. The
Kennedy administration concluded that Diem’s policies were alienating
the peasantry and contributing significantly to NLF recruitment.
The number of U.S. advisers assigned to the ARVN rose steadily. In
January 1961, when Kennedy took office, there were 800 U.S. advisers in
Vietnam; by November 1963 there were 16,700. American air power was
assigned to support ARVN operations; this included the aerial spraying
of herbicides such as Agent Orange, which was intended to deprive the
NLF of food and jungle cover. Despite these measures, the ARVN continued
to lose ground.
As the military situation deteriorated in South Vietnam, the United
States sought to blame it on Diem’s incompetence and hoped that
changes in his administration would improve the situation. Nhu’s
corruption became a principal focus, and Diem was urged to remove his
brother. Many in Diem’s military were especially dissatisfied and
hoped for increased U.S. aid. General Duong Van Minh informed the CIA
and U.S. ambassador Henry Cabot Lodge of a plot to conduct a coup
d’état against Diem. After much discussion, Kennedy approved support
for the coup. He was reportedly dismayed, however, when the coup
resulted in the murder of both Diem and Nhu on November 1, 1963. Far
from stabilizing South Vietnam, the assassination of Diem ushered in ten
successive governments within 18 months. Meanwhile, the CIA was forced
to admit that the strength of the NLF was continuing to grow.
B
The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution
Succeeding to the presidency after Kennedy’s assassination on
November 22, 1963, Lyndon B. Johnson felt he had to take a forceful
stance on Vietnam so that other Communist countries would not think that
the United States lacked resolve. Kennedy had begun to consider the
possibility of withdrawal from Vietnam and had even ordered the removal
of 1000 advisers shortly before he was assassinated, but Johnson
increased the number of U.S. advisers to 27,000 by mid-1964. Even though
intelligence reports clearly stated that most of the support for the NLF
came from the south, Johnson, like his predecessors, continued to insist
that North Vietnam was orchestrating the southern rebellion. He was
determined that he would not be held responsible for allowing Vietnam to
fall to the Communists.
Johnson believed that the key to success in the war in South Vietnam
was to frighten North Vietnam’s leaders with the possibility of
full-scale U.S. military intervention. In January 1964 he approved
top-secret, covert attacks against North Vietnamese territory, including
commando raids against bridges, railways, and coastal installations.
Johnson also ordered the U.S. Navy to conduct surveillance missions
along the North Vietnamese coast. He increased the secret bombing of
territory in Laos along the Ho Chi Minh Trail, a growing network of
paths and roads used by the NLF and the North Vietnamese to transport
supplies into South Vietnam. Hanoi concluded that the United States was
preparing to occupy South Vietnam and indicated that it, too, was
preparing for full-scale war.
On August 2, 1964, North Vietnamese coastal gunboats fired on the
destroyer USS Maddox, which had penetrated North Vietnam’s territorial
boundaries in the Gulf of Tonkin. Johnson ordered more ships to the
area, and on August 4 both the Maddox and the USS Turner Joy reported
that North Vietnamese patrol boats had fired on them. Johnson then
ordered the first air strikes against North Vietnamese territory and
went on television to seek approval from the U.S. public. (Subsequent
congressional investigations would conclude that the August 4 attack
almost certainly had never occurred.) The U.S. Congress overwhelmingly
passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which effectively handed over
war-making powers to Johnson until such time as "peace and security" had
returned to Vietnam.
After the Gulf of Tonkin incident Johnson steadily escalated U.S.
bombing of North Vietnam, which began to dispatch well-trained units of
its People’s Army of Vietnam (PAVN) into the south. The NLF guerrillas
coordinated their attacks with PAVN forces. Between February 7 and
February 10, 1965, the NLF launched surprise attacks on the U.S. air
base at Pleiku, killing 8 Americans, wounding 126, and destroying 10
aircraft; they struck again at Qui Nhon, killing 23 U.S. servicemen and
wounding 21.
Johnson responded by bombing Hanoi at a time when Soviet premier
Aleksey Kosygin was visiting, thus pushing the USSR closer to North
Vietnam and ensuring future Soviet arms deliveries to Southeast Asia.
Johnson’s advisers, chiefly Defense Secretary Robert McNamara and
National Security Adviser McGeorge Bundy, declared that a full-scale air
war against North Vietnam would depress the morale of the NLF. The
bombing did just the opposite, however. The inability of the ARVN to
protect U.S. air bases led Johnson’s senior planners to the consensus
that U.S. combat forces would be required. On March 8, 1965, 3500 U.S.
Marines landed at ÃÂàNang. By the end of April, 56,000 other combat
troops had joined them; by June the number had risen to 74,000.
IV
ESCALATED UNITED STATES INVOLVEMENT: 1965-1969
When some of the soldiers of the U.S. 9th Marine Regiment landed in
ÃÂàNang in March 1965, their orders were to protect the U.S. air base,
but the mission was quickly escalated to include search-and-destroy
patrols of the area around the base. This corresponded in miniature to
the larger strategy of General William Westmoreland. Westmoreland, who
took over the Military Assistance Command in Vietnam (MACV) in 1964,
advocated establishing a large American force and then unleashing it in
big sweeps. His strategy was that of attritionâ€â€eliminating or wearing
down the enemy by inflicting the highest death toll possible. There were
80,000 U.S. troops in Vietnam by the end of 1965; by 1969 a peak of
543,000 troops would be reached.
Having easily pushed aside the ARVN, both the North Vietnamese and
the NLF had anticipated the U.S. escalation. With full-scale movement of
U.S. troops onto South Vietnamese territory, the Communists claimed that
the Saigon regime had become a puppet, not unlike the colonial
collaborators with the French. Both the North Vietnamese and NLF
appealed to the nationalism of the Vietnamese to rise up and drive this
new foreign army from their land.
A
DRV and NLF Strategy
The strategy developed against the United States was the result of
intense debate both within the Lao Dong in the north, and between the
northerners and the NLF. Truong Chinh, the leading southern military
figure, argued that the southern Vietnamese must liberate themselves; Le
Duan, secretary general of the Lao Dong, insisted that Vietnam was one
nation and therefore dependent on all Vietnamese for its independence
and reunification. Ho Chi Minh, revered widely throughout Vietnam as the
father of independence, successfully appealed for unity. The Central
Committee Directorate for the South (also known as the Central Office
for South Vietnam, or COSVN), which was composed of DRV and NLF
representatives, was then able to coordinate a unified strategy.
After the United States initiated large-scale bombing against the DRV
in 1964, in the wake of the Gulf of Tonkin incident, Hanoi dispatched
the first unit of northern-born regular soldiers to the south.
Previously, southern-born Viet Minh, known as regroupees, had returned
to their native regions and joined NLF guerrilla units. Now PAVN
regulars, commanded by generals who had been born in the south, began to
set up bases in the Central Highlands of South Vietnam in order to gain
strategic position.
Unable to cross the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) at the 17th parallel
separating North from South Vietnam, PAVN regulars moved into South
Vietnam along the Ho Chi Minh Trail through Laos and Cambodia. In use
since 1957, the trail was originally a series of footpaths; by the late
1960s it would become a network of paved highways that enabled the motor
transport of people and equipment. The NLF guerrillas and North
Vietnamese troops were poorly armed compared to the Americans, so once
they were in South Vietnam they avoided open combat. Instead they
developed hit-and-run tactics designed to cause steady casualties among
the U.S. troops and to wear down popular support for the war in the
United States.
B
United States Strategy
In June 1964 retired general Maxwell Taylor replaced Henry Cabot
Lodge as ambassador to South Vietnam. A former chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, the military advisory group to the president, Taylor at
first opposed the introduction of American combat troops, believing that
this would make the ARVN quit fighting altogether. By 1965 he agreed to
the request of General Westmoreland for combat forces. Taylor initially
advocated an enclave strategy, where U.S. forces would seek to preserve
areas already considered to be under Saigon’s control. This quickly
proved impossible, since NLF strength was considerable virtually
everywhere in South Vietnam.
In October 1965 the newly arrived 1st Cavalry Division of the U.S.
Army fought one of the largest battles of the Vietnam War in the Ia
Drang Valley, inflicting a serious defeat on North Vietnamese forces.
The North Vietnamese and NLF forces changed their tactics as a result of
the battle. From then on both would fight at times of their choosing,
hitting rapidly, with surprise if possible, and then withdrawing just as
quickly to avoid the impact of American firepower. The success of the
American campaign in the Ia Drang Valley convinced Westmoreland that his
strategy of attrition was the key to U.S. victory. He ordered the
largest search-and-destroy operations of the war in the “Iron
Triangle,†the Communist stronghold northeast of Saigon. This
operation was intended to find and destroy North Vietnam and NLF
military headquarters, but the campaign failed to wipe out Communist
forces from the area.
By 1967 the ground war had reached a stalemate, which led Johnson
and McNamara to increase the ferocity of the air war. The Joint Chiefs
of Staff had been pressing for this for some time, but there was already
some indication that intensified bombing would not produce the desired
results. In 1966 the bombing of North Vietnam’s oil facilities had
destroyed 70 percent of their fuel reserves, but the DRV’s ability to
wage the war had not been affected.
Planners wished to avoid populated areas, but when 150,000 sorties
per year were being flown by U.S. warplanes, civilian casualties were
inevitable. These casualties provoked revulsion both in the United
States and internationally. In 1967 the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff, General Earle Wheeler, declared that no more “major military
targets†were left. Unable to widen the bombing to population centers
for fear of Chinese and Soviet reactions in support of North Vietnam,
the U.S. Department of Defense had to admit stalemate in the air war as
well. The damage that had already been inflicted on Vietnam’s
population was enormous.
C
The Tet Offensive and Beyond
In 1967 North Vietnam and the NLF decided the time had come to mount
an all-out offensive aimed at inflicting serious losses on both the ARVN
and U.S. forces. They planned the Tet Offensive with the hope that this
would significantly affect the public mood in the United States. In
December 1967 North Vietnamese troops attacked and surrounded the U.S.
Marine base at Khe Sanh, placing it under siege. Westmoreland ordered
the outpost held at all costs. To prevent the Communists from
overrunning the base, about 50,000 U.S. Marines and Army troops were
called into the area, thus weakening positions further south.
This concentration of American troops in one spot was exactly what the
COSVN strategists had hoped would happen. The main thrust of the Tet
Offensive then began on January 31, 1968, at the start of Tet, or the
Vietnamese lunar new year celebration, when a lull in fighting
traditionally took place. Most ARVN troops had gone home on leave, and
U.S. troops were on stand-down in many areas. Over 85,000 NLF soldiers
simultaneously struck at almost every major city and provincial capital
across South Vietnam, sending their defenders reeling. The U.S. Embassy
in Saigon, previously thought to be invulnerable, was taken over by the
NLF, and held for eight hours before U.S. forces could retake the
complex. It took three weeks for U.S. troops to dislodge 1000 NLF
fighters from Saigon.
During the Tet Offensive, the imperial capital of Hue witnessed the
bloodiest fighting of the entire war. South Vietnamese were assassinated
by Communists for collaborating with Americans; then when the ARVN
returned, NLF sympathizers were murdered. United States Marines and
paratroopers were ordered to go from house to house to find North
Vietnamese and NLF soldiers. Virtually indiscriminate shelling was what
killed most civilians, however, and the architectural treasures of Hue
were laid to waste. More than 100,000 residents of the city were left
homeless.
The Tet Offensive as a whole lasted into the fall of 1968, and when
it was over the North Vietnamese and the NLF had suffered acute losses.
The U.S. Department of Defense estimated that a total of 45,000 North
Vietnamese and NLF soldiers had been killed, most of them NLF fighters.
Although it was covered up for more than a year, one horrifying event
during the Tet Offensive would indelibly affect America’s psyche. In
March 1968 elements of the U.S. Army’s Americal Division wiped out an
entire hamlet called My Lai, killing 500 unarmed civilians, mostly women
and children.
After Tet, Westmoreland said that the enemy was almost conquered and
requested 206,000 more troops to finish the job. Told by succeeding
administrations since 1955 that there was “light at the end of the
tunnel,†that victory in Vietnam was near, the American public had
reached a psychological breaking point. The success of the NLF in
coordinating the Tet Offensive demonstrated both how deeply rooted the
Communist resistance was and how costly it would be for the United
States to remain in Vietnam. After Tet a majority of Americans wanted
some closure to the war, with some favoring an immediate withdrawal
while others held out for a negotiated peace. President Johnson rejected
Westmoreland’s request for more troops and replaced him as the
commander of U.S. forces in Vietnam with Westmoreland’s deputy,
General Creighton Abrams. Johnson himself decided not to seek reelection
in 1968. Republican Richard Nixon ran for the presidency declaring that
he would bring “peace with honor†if elected.
V
ENDING THE WAR: 1969-1975
Promising an end to the war in Vietnam, Richard Nixon won a narrow
victory in the election of 1968. Slightly more than 30,000 young
Americans had been killed in the war when Nixon took office in January
1969. The new president retained his predecessor’s goal of a
non-Communist South Vietnam, however, and this could not be ensured
without continuing the war. Nixon’s most pressing problem was how to
make peace and war at the same time. His answer was a policy called
“Vietnamization.†Under this policy, he would withdraw American
troops and the South Vietnamese army would take over the fighting.
A
Nixon’s Vietnamization
During his campaign for the presidency, Nixon announced that he had a
secret plan to end the war. In July 1969, after he had become president,
he issued what came to be known as the Nixon doctrine, which stated that
U.S. troops would no longer be directly involved in Asian wars. He
ordered the withdrawal of 25,000 troops, to be followed by more, and he
lowered draft calls. On the other hand, Nixon also stepped up the
Phoenix Program, a secret CIA operation that resulted in the
assassination of 20,000 suspected NLF guerrillas, many of whom were
innocent civilians. The operation increased funding for the ARVN and
intensified the bombing of North Vietnam. Nixon reasoned that to keep
the Communists at bay during the U.S. withdrawal, it was also necessary
to bomb their sanctuaries in Cambodia and to increase air strikes
against Laos.
The DRV leadership, however, remained committed to the expulsion of
all U.S. troops from Vietnam and to the overthrow of the Saigon
government. As U.S. troop strength diminished, Hanoi’s leaders planned
their final offensive. While the ARVN had increased in size and was
better armed than it had been in 1965, it could not hold its own without
the help of heavy U.S. air power.
B
Failed Peace Negotiations
Johnson had initiated peace negotiations after the first phase of the
Tet Offensive. Beginning in Paris on May 13, 1968, the talks rapidly
broke down over disagreements about the status of the NLF, which the
Saigon government refused to recognize. In October 1968, just before the
U.S. presidential elections, candidate Hubert Humphrey called for a
negotiated settlement, but Nixon secretly persuaded South Vietnam’s
President Nguyen Van Thieu to hold out for better terms under a Nixon
administration. Stating that he would never negotiate with Communists,
Thieu caused the Paris talks to collapse and contributed to Humphrey’s
defeat as well.
Nixon thus inherited the Paris peace talks, but they continued to
remain stalled as each faction refused to alter its position. Hanoi
insisted on the withdrawal of all U.S. forces, the removal of the Saigon
government, and its replacement through free elections that would
include the Provisional Revolutionary Government (PRG), which the NLF
created in June 1969 to take over its governmental role in the south and
serve as a counterpart to the Saigon government. The United States, on
the other hand, insisted that all North Vietnamese troops be withdrawn.
C
Invasion of Cambodia
In March 1969 Nixon ordered the secret bombing of Cambodia. Intended
to wipe out North Vietnamese and NLF base camps along the border with
South Vietnam in order to provide time for the buildup of the ARVN, the
campaign failed utterly. The secret bombing lasted four years and caused
great destruction and upheaval in Cambodia, a land of farmers that had
not known war in centuries. Code-named Operation Menu, the bombing was
more intense than that carried out over Vietnam. An estimated 100,000
peasants died in the bombing, while 2 million people were left homeless.
In April 1970 Nixon ordered U.S. troops into Cambodia. He argued
that this was necessary to protect the security of American units then
in the process of withdrawing from Vietnam, but he also wanted to buy
security for the Saigon regime. When Nixon announced the invasion, U.S.
college campuses erupted in protest, and one-third of them shut down due
to student walkouts. At Kent State University in Ohio four students were
killed by panicky national guardsmen who had been called up to prevent
rioting. Two days later, two students were killed at Jackson State
College in Mississippi. Congress proceeded to repeal the Gulf of Tonkin
Resolution. Congress also passed the Cooper-Church Amendment, which
specifically forbade the use of U.S. troops outside South Vietnam. The
measure did not expressly forbid bombing, however, so Nixon continued
the air strikes on Cambodia until 1973.
Three months after committing U.S. forces, Nixon ordered them to
withdraw from Cambodia. The combined effects of the bombing and the
invasion, however, had completely disrupted Cambodian life, driving
millions of peasants from their ancestral lands. The right-wing
government then in power in Cambodia was supported by the United States,
and the government was blamed for allowing the bombing to occur. Farmers
who had never concerned themselves with politics now flooded to the
Communist opposition group, the Khmer Rouge. After a gruesome civil war,
the Khmer Rouge took power in 1975 and became one of the bloodiest
regimes of the 20th century.
D
Campaign in Laos
The United States began conducting secret bombing of Laos in 1964,
targeting both the North Vietnamese forces along sections of the Ho Chi
Minh Trail and the Communist Pathet Lao guerrillas, who controlled the
northern part of the country. Roughly 150,000 tons of bombs were dropped
on the Plain of Jars in northern Laos between 1964 and 1969. By 1970 at
least one-quarter of the entire population of Laos were refugees, and
about 750,000 Lao had been killed.
Prohibited by the Cooper-Church Amendment from deploying U.S. troops
and anxious to demonstrate the fighting prowess of the improved ARVN,
Nixon took the advice of General Creighton Abrams and attempted to cut
vital Communist supply lines along the Ho Chi Minh Trail. On February 8,
1971, 21,000 ARVN troops, supported by American B-52 bombers, invaded
Laos. Intended to disrupt any North Vietnamese and NLF plans for
offensives and to test the strength of the ARVN, this operation was as
much a failure as the Cambodian invasion. Abrams claimed 14,000 North
Vietnamese casualties, but over 9000 ARVN soldiers were killed or
wounded, while the rest were routed and expelled from Laos.
The success of Vietnamization seemed highly doubtful, since the
Communist forces showed that the new ARVN could be defeated. Instead of
inhibiting the Communist Pathet Lao, the U.S. attacks on Laos promoted
their rise. In 1958 the Pathet Lao had the support of one-third of the
population; by 1973 a majority denied the legitimacy of the
U.S.-supported Royal Lao Government. By 1975 a Communist government was
established in Laos.
E
Bombing of North Vietnam
In the spring of 1972, with only 6000 U.S. combat troops remaining
in South Vietnam, the DRV leadership decided the time had come to crush
the ARVN. On March 30 over 30,000 North Vietnamese troops crossed the
Demilitarized Zone, along with another 150,000 PRG fighters, and
attacked Quang TràProvince, easily scattering ARVN defenders. The
attack, known as the Easter Offensive, could not have come at a worse
time for Nixon and his National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger. A
military defeat of the ARVN would leave the United States in a weak
position at the Paris peace talks and would compromise its strategic
position globally.
Risking the success of the upcoming Moscow summit, Nixon unleashed
the first sustained bombing of North Vietnam since 1969 and moved
quickly to mine the harbor of Haiphong. Between April and October 1972
the United States conducted 41,000 sorties over North Vietnam,
especially targeting Quang TrÃÂ. North Vietnam’s Easter Offensive was
crushed. At least 100,000 Communist troops were killed. The ailing Vo
Nguyen Giap, founder of North Vietnam’s army, was forced into
retirement and succeeded by Van Tien Dung, who counseled the renewal of
negotiations with the United States.
Further negotiations were held in Paris between Kissinger and Le Duc
Tho, who represented North Vietnam. Seeking an end to the war before the
U.S. presidential elections in November, Kissinger made remarkable
concessions. The United States would withdraw completely, while
accepting the presence of 14 North Vietnamese divisions in South Vietnam
and recognizing the political legitimacy of the PRG. Hanoi would drop
its insistence on the resignation of Nguyen van Thieu, who had become
president of South Vietnam in 1967. Kissinger announced on October 27
that “peace was at hand.†Thieu, however, accused the United States
of selling him out and Nixon refused to sign the agreement.
After the 1972 elections, Kissinger attempted to revise the
agreements he had already made. North Vietnam refused to consider these
revisions, and Kissinger threatened to renew air assaults against North
Vietnam unless the new conditions were met. Nixon then unleashed at
Christmas the final and most intense bombing of the war over Hanoi and
Haiphong.
F
United States Withdrawal
While many U.S. officials were convinced that Hanoi was bombed back
to the negotiating table, the final treaty changed nothing significant
from what had already been agreed to by Kissinger and Tho in October.
Nixon’s Christmas Bombing was intended to warn Hanoi that American air
power remained a threat, and he secretly promised Thieu that the United
States would punish North Vietnam should they violate the terms of the
final settlement. Nixon’s political fortunes were about to decline,
however. Although he had won reelection by a landslide in November 1972,
he was suffering from revelations about the Watergate scandal. The
president’s campaign officials had orchestrated a burglary at the
Democratic National Committee headquarters, and Nixon had attempted to
cover it up by lying to the American people about his role.
The president made new enemies when the secret bombing of Cambodia
was revealed at last. Congress was threatening a bill of impeachment and
in early January 1973 indicated it would cut off all funding for
operations in Indochina once U.S. forces had withdrawn. In mid-January
Nixon halted all military actions against North Vietnam.
On January 27, 1973, all four parties to the Vietnam conflictâ€â€the
United States, South Vietnam, the PRG, and North Vietnamâ€â€signed the
Treaty of Paris. The final terms provided for the release of all
American prisoners of war from North Vietnam; the withdrawal of all U.S.
forces from South Vietnam; the end of all foreign military operations in
Laos and Cambodia; a cease-fire between North and South Vietnam; the
formation of a National Council of Reconciliation to help South Vietnam
form a new government; and continued U.S. military and economic aid to
South Vietnam. In a secret addition to the treaty Nixon also promised
$3.25 billion in reparations for the reconstruction of ravaged North
Vietnam, an agreement that Congress ultimately refused to uphold.
G
Cease-fire Aftermath
On March 29, 1973, the last U.S. troops left Vietnam. Thieu quickly
showed that he had no desire to honor the terms of the Paris peace
treaty, which he had signed under duress. He issued an order to the
ARVN: “If Communists come into your village, shoot them in the
head.†Thieu immediately began offensives against PRG villages, in
open violation of the treaty. Thieu believed the continued presence of
North Vietnamese soldiers on South Vietnamese soil threatened South
Vietnam’s existence.
North Vietnam and the PRG refrained from taking any action against
the ARVN’s provocation, keeping carefully to the treaty terms (except
for maintaining troops in Laos and Cambodia). They insisted that both
Saigon and the United States also abide by the treaty. Not wishing to be
caught unprepared by treaty violations, the Communists concentrated on
logistics and infrastructure by building roads to accommodate the
movement of troops.
Meanwhile, the withdrawal of U.S. personnel had resulted in a
collapsing economy throughout South Vietnam. Millions had depended on
the money spent by Americans in Vietnam. Thieu’s government was
ill-equipped to treat the mass unemployment and deepening poverty that
resulted from the U.S. withdrawal. The ARVN still received $700 million
from the U.S. Congress and was twice the size of the Communist forces,
but morale was collapsing. Over 200,000 ARVN soldiers deserted in 1974
in order to be with their families.
Having no faith that the Paris treaty would be implemented, the
North Vietnamese set 1975 as the year to mount their final offensive.
They believed it would take at least two years; the rapid collapse of
the ARVN was therefore a surprise even to them. After the initial attack
by the North Vietnamese in the Central Highlands northeast of Saigon on
January 7, the ARVN immediately began to fall apart. On March 25 the
ancient imperial city of Hue fell; then on March 29, ÃÂàNang, the
former U.S. Marine headquarters, was overtaken. On April 20 Thieu
resigned, accusing the United States of betrayal. His successor was
Duong Van Minh, who had been among those who overthrew Diem in 1963. On
April 30 Minh issued his unconditional surrender to the PRG. Almost 30
years after Ho Chi Minh’s declaration of independence, Vietnam was
finally unified.
VI
THE TROOPS
In the United States, military conscription, or the draft, had been
in place virtually without interruption since the end of World War II,
but volunteers generally predominated in combat units. When the first
U.S. combat troops arrived in Vietnam in 1965 they were composed mainly
of volunteers. The Air Force, Navy, and Marines were volunteer units.
The escalating war, however, required more draftees. In 1965 about
20,000 men per month were inducted into the military, most into the
Army; by 1968 about 40,000 young men were drafted each month to meet
increased troop levels ordered for Vietnam. The conscript army was
largely composed of teenagers; the average age of a U.S. soldier in
Vietnam was 19.
Those conscripted were mostly youths from the poorer section of
American society, who did not have access to the exemptions that were
available to their more privileged fellow citizens. Of the numerous
exemptions from military service that Congress had written into law, the
most far-reaching were student deferments. The draft laws effectively
enabled most upper- and middle-class youngsters to avoid military
service. By 1968 it was increasingly evident that the draft system was
deeply unfair and discriminatory. Responding to popular pressures, the
Selective Service, the agency that administered the draft, instituted a
lottery system, which might have produced an army more representative of
society at large. Student deferments were kept by Nixon until 1971,
however, so as not to alienate middle-class voters. By then his
Vietnamization policy had lowered monthly draft calls, and physical
exemptions were still easily obtained by the privileged, especially from
draft boards in affluent communities.
Both North and South Vietnam also conscripted troops. Revolutionary
nationalist ideology was quite strong in the north, and the DRV was able
to create an army with well-disciplined, highly motivated troops. It
became the fourth-largest army in the world and one of the most
experienced. South Vietnam also drafted soldiers, beginning in 1955 when
the ARVN was created. Most ARVN conscripts, however, had little personal
motivation to fight other than a paycheck. In 1965, 113,000 deserted
from the ARVN; by 1972, 20,000 per month were slipping away from the
war.
Although equipped with high-tech weaponry that far exceeded the fire
power available to its enemies, the ARVN was poorly led and failed most
of the time to check its opponents’ actions. United States troops came
to dislike and mistrust many ARVN units, accusing them of abandoning the
battlefield. The ARVN also suffered from internal corruption. Numerous
commanders would claim nonexistent troopers and then pocket the pay
intended for those troopers; this practice made some units dangerously
understaffed. Many ARVN soldiers were secretly working for the NLF,
providing information that undermined the U.S. effort. At various times,
battles verging on civil war broke out between troops within the ARVN.
Internal disunity on this scale was never an issue among the North
Vietnamese troops or the NLF guerrillas.
The armed forces of the United States serving in Vietnam began to
suffer from internal dissension and low morale as well. Racism against
the Vietnamese troubled many soldiers, particularly those who had
experienced racism directed against themselves in the United States. In
Vietnam, Americans routinely referred to all Vietnamese, both friend and
foe, as “gooks.†This process of dehumanizing the Vietnamese led to
many atrocities, including the massacre at My Lai, and it provoked
profound misgivings among U.S. troops. The injustice of the Selective
Service system also turned soldiers against the war. By 1968
coffeehouses run by soldiers had sprung up at 26 U.S. bases, serving as
forums for antiwar activities. At least 250 underground antiwar
newspapers were published by active-duty soldiers.
Soldiers sometimes took out their frustrations and resentments on
those officers who put their lives at risk. The term “fragging†came
to be used to describe soldiers attacking their officers, often tossing
fragmentation grenades into the officers’ sleeping quarters. According
to one official account, 382 such fragging incidents occurred between
1969 and 1971. Other sources estimate a higher number of fraggings,
since many went unreported.
By 1971, as Vietnamization proceeded with U.S. troop withdrawals, no
soldier wished to be the last one killed in Vietnam. Consequently,
entire units refused to go out on combat patrols, disobeying direct
orders. The desertion rate in the Army peaked at 73.5 per 1000 soldiers
in 1971, noticeably higher than the peak desertion rates reached during
the Korean War and World War II. Another half million men received less
than honorable discharges. Vietnam Veterans Against the War was
organized in the United States in 1967. By the 1970s the participation
of Vietnam veterans in protests against the war in the United States had
an important influence on the antiwar movement.
VII
RESPONSE TO THE WAR IN THE UNITED STATES
Opposition to the war in the United States developed immediately
after the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, chiefly among traditional
pacifists, such as the American Friends Service Committee and
antinuclear activists. Early protests were organized around questions
about the morality of U.S. military involvement in Vietnam. Virtually
every key event of the war, including the Tet Offensive and the invasion
of Cambodia, contributed to a steady rise in antiwar sentiment. The
revelation of the My Lai Massacre in 1969 caused a dramatic turn against
the war in national polls.
Students and professors began to organize “teach-ins†on the war
in early 1965 at the University of Michigan, the University of
Wisconsin, and the University of California at Berkeley. The teach-ins
were large forums for discussion of the war between students and faculty
members. Eventually, virtually no college or university was without an
organized student movement, often spearheaded by Students for a
Democratic Society (SDS). The first major student-led demonstration
against the war was organized by SDS in April 1965 and stunned observers
by mobilizing about 20,000 participants. Another important organization
was the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), which
denounced the war as racist as early as 1965. Students also joined The
Resistance, an organization that urged its student members to refuse to
register for the draft, or if drafted to refuse to serve.
While law enforcement authorities usually blamed student radicals for
the violence that took place on campuses, often it was police themselves
who initiated bloodshed as they cleared out students occupying campus
buildings during “sit-ins†or street demonstrations. As antiwar
sentiment mounted in intensity from 1965 to 1970 so did violence,
culminating in the killings of four students at Kent State in Ohio and
of two at Jackson State College in Mississippi.
Stokely Carmichael, Malcolm X, and other black leaders denounced the
U.S. presence in Vietnam as evidence of American imperialism. Martin
Luther King, Jr., had grown increasingly concerned about the racist
nature of the war, toward both the Vietnamese and the disproportionately
large numbers of young blacks who were sent to fight for the United
States in Vietnam. In 1967 King delivered a major address at New
York’s Riverside Church in which he condemned the war, calling the
United States “the world’s greatest purveyor of violence.â€Â
On October 15, 1969, citizens across the United States participated
in The Moratorium, the largest one-day demonstration against the war.
Millions of people stayed home from work to mark their opposition to the
war; college and high school students demonstrated on hundreds of
campuses. A Baltimore judge even interrupted court proceedings for a
moment of reflection on the war. In Vietnam, troops wore black armbands
in honor of the home-front protest. Nixon claimed there was a “great
silent majority†who supported the war and he called on them to back
his policies. Polls showed, however, that at that time half of all
Americans felt that the war was “morally indefensible,†while 60
percent admitted that it was a mistake. In November 1969 students from
all over the country headed for Washington, D.C., for the Mobilization
Against the War. Over 40,000 participated in a March Against Death from
Arlington National Cemetery to the White House, each carrying a placard
with the name of a young person killed in Vietnam.
Opposition existed even among conservatives and business leaders, for
primarily economic reasons. The government was spending more than $2
billion per month on the war by 1967. Some U.S. corporations, ranging
from beer distributors to manufacturers of jet aircraft, benefited
greatly from this money initially, but the high expense of the war began
to cause serious inflation and rising tax rates. Some corporate critics
warned of future costs to care for the wounded. Labor unions were also
becoming increasingly militant in opposition to the war, as they were
forced to respond to the concerns of their members that the draft was
imposing an unfair burden on working-class people.
Another factor that turned public opinion against the war was the
publication of the Pentagon Papers on June 13, 1971, by the New York
Times. Compiled secretly by the U.S. Department of Defense, the papers
were a complete history of the involvement of numerous government
agencies in the Vietnam War. They showed a clear pattern of deception
toward the public. One of the senior analysts compiling this history,
Daniel Ellsberg, secretly photocopied key documents and gave them to the
New York Times. Subsequently, support for Nixon’s war policies
plummeted, and polls showed that 60 percent of the public now considered
the war “immoral,†while 70 percent demanded an immediate withdrawal
from Vietnam.
The Vietnam War cost the United States $130 billion directly, and at
least that amount in indirect costs, such as veterans’ and widows’
benefits and the search for Americans Missing-in-Action (MIAs). The war
also spurred serious inflation, contributing to a substantially
increased cost of living in the United States between 1965 and 1975,
with continued repercussions thereafter. More than 58,000 Americans lost
their lives in Vietnam. Over 300,000 U.S. soldiers were wounded, half of
them very seriously. No accurate accounting has ever been made of U.S
civilians (U.S. government agents, religious missionaries, Red Cross
nurses) killed throughout Indochina.
After returning from the war, many Vietnam veterans suffered from
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, which is characterized by persistent
emotional problems including anxiety and depression. The Department of
Veterans Affairs estimates that 20,000 Vietnam veterans have committed
suicide in the war’s aftermath. Throughout the 1970s and 1980s,
unemployment and rates of prison incarceration for Vietnam veterans,
especially those having seen heavy combat, were significantly higher
than in the general population.
Having felt ignored or disrespected both by the Veterans
Administration (now the Department of Veterans Affairs) and by
traditional organizations such as the Veterans of Foreign Wars and the
American Legion, Vietnam veterans have formed their own self-help
groups. Collectively, they forced the Veterans Administration to
establish storefront counseling centers, staffed by veterans, in every
major city. The national organization, Vietnam Veterans of America
(VVA), has become one of the most important service organizations
lobbying in Washington, D.C.
Also in the capital, the Vietnam Veterans Memorial was dedicated in
1982 to commemorate the U.S. personnel who died or were declared missing
in action in Vietnam. The memorial, which consists of a V-shaped black
granite wall etched with more than 58,000 names, was at first a source
of controversy because it does not glorify the military but invites
somber reflection. The Asian ancestry of its prizewinning designer, Maya
Lin, was also an issue for some veterans. In 1983 a bronze cast was
added, depicting one white, one black, and one Hispanic American
soldier. This led to additional controversy since some argued that the
sculpture muted the original memorial’s solemn message. In 1993 a
statue of three women cradling a wounded soldier was also added to the
site to commemorate the service of the 11,000 military nurses who
treated soldiers in Vietnam. Despite all of the controversies, the
Vietnam Veterans Memorial has become a site of pilgrimage for veterans
and civilians alike.
While the United States has been involved in a number of armed
interventions worldwide since it withdrew from Vietnam in 1973, defense
planners have taken pains to persuade the public that goals were limited
and troops would be committed only for a specified duration. The war in
Vietnam created an ongoing debate about the right of the United States
to intervene in the affairs of other nations.
VIII
EFFECTS AND RECOVERY IN VIETNAM
Although South Vietnam was ostensibly the U.S. ally in the conflict,
far more firepower was unleashed on South Vietnamese civilians than on
northerners. About 10 percent of all bombs and shells went unexploded
and continued to kill and maim throughout the region long after the war,
as did buried land mines. Vietnam developed the highest rate of birth
defects in the world, probably due to the use of Agent Orange and other
chemical defoliants. The defoliants used during the war also destroyed
about 15 percent of South Vietnam’s valuable timber resources and
contributed to a serious decline in rice and fish production, the major
sources of food for Vietnam.
There were 800,000 orphans created in South Vietnam alone. At least
10 million people became homeless refugees in the south. Vietnam’s
government punished those Vietnamese who had been allied with the United
States by sending them to “re-education camps†and depriving their
families of employment. These measures combined with economic hardships
throughout Vietnam led to the exodus of about 1.5 million people, most
of them to the United States as refugees. The children of U.S. soldiers
and Vietnamese women, often called “AmerAsians,†were looked down
upon by the Vietnamese, and many of them immigrated to the United
States.
Nixon promised $3.25 billion in reconstruction aid to Vietnam, but
the aid was never granted. Neither Gerald Ford, who became president
after Nixon’s resignation, nor Congress would assume any
responsibility for the devastation of Vietnam. Instead, in 1975 Ford
extended the embargo already in effect against North Vietnam to all of
newly unified Vietnam. In the Foreign Assistance Appropriation Act of
1976, Congress forbade any assistance for Vietnam or Cambodia.
President Jimmy Carter attempted to resume relations with Vietnam in
1977, declaring that “the destruction was mutual.†Talks broke down,
however, over the issue of American MIAs and over the promised
reparations, especially after the Vietnamese released a copy of
Nixon’s secret letter of 1973, which promised aid “without any
preconditions.†Fearing that reparations would amount to an admission
of wrongdoing, Congress added amendments to trade bills that also cut
Vietnam off from international lending agencies like the International
Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank) and the
International Monetary Fund (IMF). Normalization was suspended,
deepening the economic crisis facing Vietnam in the aftermath of the
war’s destruction. The crisis was worsened by new wars with China and
Cambodia in 1978 and 1979.
Cut off from all other sources of aid, the SRV turned to the Soviet
Union for loans and technical advisers. The SRV reasoned that, faced
with widespread hunger and enormous health problems, restoring
agricultural production was paramount. The government therefore seized
private property, collectivized plantations, and nationalized
businesses. About 1 million civilians were forcibly moved from cities to
new economic zones. Mismanagement and corruption became common, and
popular disillusion with the regime grew. At the Sixth Party Congress in
1986, the SRV leadership declared Communism a failed experiment and
vowed radical change. Calling the reforms doi moi (economic renovation),
the SRV opened Vietnam to capitalism. After the collapse of the USSR in
1991, the SRV leadership was forced to move further in this direction.
Stepping up efforts to find American MIAs and cooperating with World
Bank and IMF guidelines for economic reform, Vietnam worked to improve
relations with the United States. In February 1994 President Bill
Clinton lifted the trade embargo, and on July 11, 1995, the United
States formally restored full diplomatic relations with Vietnam.
Contributed By:
Paul Atwood
Microsoft ® Encarta ® Encyclopedia 2002. © 1993-2001 Microsoft
Corporation. All rights reserved.
ì¥Â@