Referat Justice
Mai jos puteti citi fragmente din
Referat Justice si de asemenea puteti face
Download Referat JusticeCiteste fragmente din Referat Justice
TOWARDS A PERFECT
JUSTICE AGENCY
they lived for
truth
and suffered
for their trust
in the power
of justice
all was good
at their trade
but they always
be failures?
1.THE NEED OF A MORE POWERFUL JUSTICE AGENCY
Now, in world are many categories of people.
There are people who have a sense or a consciosness of justice and there
are people who search for the best ways to gain succes independentlly of
the
justice principles.
The justice agent is imperfect in the folowing sense:
it do not know all the illegalities that was made, that are made and
that will be made.
it cannot prevent all the illegalities.
it cannot punish all the people who
had made ilegalities; there are many people in the world and in the
history of world that, due to their mony or manipulative and deceptive
inteligence or relationships, escape of punishment .
sometimes laws are injust.
our justice conception is progressible.
Because of this imperfections many people, about justice agent do not
know, or maybe do not want to know, anything, had suffered. It is
imposible for me to present their list or the quantity of their pain.
There exist and existed before many people in the world who search the
imperfections and weakenesses of laws to make the most profitable
injusticies. And, after they made this injusticies they wipe all signs.
When this injusticies are to great, and it seem that it is no posible
any application of a punisment, those who suffer them blaim god...
It is a great need of an perfect impartial justice agent, but, there is
no god...
If there is no omniscience and omnipotence, there cannot be
omnijustice?
In the history of world there was many inteligent peoples who discovered
many new posibities.
On the one hand, there was scientists, artists, politicians, lawers, and
others that discovered new good posibilities, on the other hand, there
was and there are people who discover new injust profitable
posibilities.
It seem that there is no, and there will never be a world in wich the
posibility to make injusticies to be minimized.
What make it posible the realization of these injust actions?
How would be posible to minimze the number and gravity of injust
actions?
How much would be the gain and the happiness of minimization of
injustice?
From antiquity humans aspired at a perfect/divine justice and justice
agent.
But, a perfect justice agent involve omniscience, omnipotence and
impartiality...
However, I think that human justice and justice agency can make new
fundamental evolutionary steps.
I think at the ways of minimize the injust actions; justice agent is
taken many times tipically by surprise.
There are no scientific institutionalised systematic efforts to
calculate all the posible injust actions at all the levels of society
at the level of individ.
at the level public institutions.
at the level of press.
at the political level.
If this posibilities of illegal actions
would be know, the next step would can be their prevention.
There are no scientific institutionalised systematic efforts to
calculate the absolute action posibilities and the context-relative
actions posibilities at all the previous levels and for all the posible
contexts, for our security.
There are no payed scientific institutionalised systematic efforts to
find ways to minimize the the posibility of realization of all the
injust posibilities.
That is why, at least in part, we suffer in continuation.
It is not the most inteligent thing
to have good experts for discovery of injust actions.
I think that, a great evolutionary step in human justice and justice
agency
would be assured by the systematic pursuit of the next pragmatic
regulative principle:
The minimization of the posibilities to make injust actions imply the
minimization of realization of injust actions.
But, I think that, the application of this principle have as a previous
condition of posibility the knowledge of all injust strategical
posibilities of agents at all the social organization levels.
Maybe this principle, sometimes, was pursuited, but, in an unconscious
or inexplicit and nonscientific, noninstitutionalised manner.
In the time in wich we work hardlly with our inteligence in the limits
of our justice conception, others try to develop a deceptive and
manipulative and thief inteligence to gain the results of our work and
our deserved
place in the social hierarchy.
We loss because of our justice principles of behaviour and because of
the imperfections of justice agency.
Sometimes, we have not time or we are incapable to calculate all the
injust posibilities wich would can affect us.
On the other hand, why we live in society? To manipulate and deceive
each others?
Always will be people wich will love this posibility.
But, if the justice agency is inefficient
how will we rationally justify our just actions?
By non-inteligence?
By the evolution of inteligence appear new deceptive and manipulative
posibilities.
I think that wisdom must to imply justice and freedom, therefore it does
not involve deceptive and manipulative behaviour, but this thoughts must
to be grounded.
A rational belive would say that the deceptive and manipulative
behaviour will be detected at least in long time, but this is not
necessary or depend also on the evolution of justice agency.
I tell you an partial story to see a
kind of injust posibility:
There was once, a workoholic student.
But, this student was very
independent and critical in his ideas and behaviour at courses and
seminars.
This student have had in its class a student competitor that was very
sly:
she tried to gain the sympathy of proffesors by flatering them and
relative to class have had a nice, but, in secret, very deceptive and
manipulative behaviour. For exemple, in the ideatic fights in class she
allied temporarlly
with everybody, even with its anemies, for the sake of succes. Its
mentality was fundamentaly independent of every justice conception; but
it showed herself
as a good person, especially to those weak.
When the individual and independent thinking of the workoholic student
have arrived at some veridical ideas, she tried to misinterpret its
behaviour:
she tried to attract the discredit and irony of class and of professors
on it.
she used subtle tactics of psychological influence; for exemple, when he
was was said
something, she tried to stomble it by creating some ironical backgrounds
or by irritating it etc.
This competitor student tried to create for herself good relationships
with some proffesors, those who had a similar interests with she. Its
mentality was, in secret, one fundamentaly sly, injust.
Most times she was not sufficient powerfull to win independently and
with the power of truth or of just inteligence.
That is why she used other injust tactics.
After she gained the sympathy of those who feeled somehow threatened
theirself, they had begun to fight together legally but injustlly.
The workoholic and independent student, who always tried to win with
truth in the limits of justice, feeled more hate relative to its
competitor fundamental etichal mentality.
Therefore, it selected a licence theme in the same domain with its
competitor to be in competition with she.
Both was under the co-ordination of the same professor, so she begun to
friendlly "understand" with the
professor.
The independent one begun to work hardly informing itself by
international journals(in some limits, because was poor), but hated the
idea to be c-oo-rdinated by somebody, much more he tried to compete with
this professor at seminars.
The formal conditions wich should be fulfilled by licence works and
their evaluation criterions was not popularized.
On the other hand, the workoholic student sometimes changed the
bibliography for some papers in favour of some other better
bibliography.
In final, all presented their licence work.
The workoholic student s licence work does not filled some formal
conditions, about he does not knew anything, and was rejected.
Its pain was inexpressible and its competitor received a maxim
evaluation.
The workoholic one was at least by the first active minds in its class.
Its work was substantiated by the wish of a rational and hierarchical
progress,in the shorter possible time.
He lost friends for study time, lived far from home and was sponsorized
most times only by a poor and sickly mother. And this was the result.
He loved philosophy of science, logic and tended toward a absolut
thinking.
She had and have fundamentally an
dialectic-pragmatic-deceptive-manipulative mentality, and this peoples
are dominant now days.
Now, she is at master in philosophy of science and he is not.
Someday, he made a visit at his previous colleagues from faculty wich
are now at master and she hardlly retained to burst into laughter with
all its heart...when saw him.
Those who know the mentality exhibited by all the students in four years
in faculty, also know who would be deserved to progress in this sense
and who does not deserved. In truth, here was made an legall injustice.
The absolute or individual power lover have another chance in the
february of 2004, with the same professor.
After of a summer of study he presented to profesor a new bibliography,
the professor ignored all its work and gived to he another bibliography,
I think not a better one.
The professor selected the co-authors names for bibliography so as if
the student accept this to be for him un unbearable humility and if does
not accept to reject him again.
When the professor rejected him first time he said "you can to come to
me one hundred of times!"...
The professor do not like to hear the student s arguments and suggested
to student, with other words, that if he do not like something to change
the professor.
This profesor have an eliminativist
lover thinking(he like Churchlands) and said to student that there is no
manipulation and subtle psychological coercition.
The student asked to professor to give him the licence work of its
competitor for critics, given the fact that they was in the field of
philosophy where "who reject the examination of reason does not deserve
respect", but the professor does not want to give to him...
In truth, this professor protect its competitor licence work against
critics, injustly, but with fine words...
Sometimes, this student is very desperate, he think that all was useless
and cannot accept this... he fear that he never will have the chance to
revenge in the limits of law on its injust competitors, because they try
to distroy its progress...
When he loss every hope, alternate between desperation and criminal
fury...
I feel regret for this man, but I cannot help him.
There is now law for this kind of injusticies in his country...
In addition, he haven t mony to sponsorise lawers.
He have no evidences.
The professors are all united.
Much more, this injustice was made by professor on legall grounds.
He arrived in this situation because always hated to develop its
manipulation and deception abilities.
He hated some aspects of social life.
There are many people now on the planet who have fundamentally an injust
mentality.
There are many situations for wich justice agency is not prepared to
solve them.
And, this is because it does not know neither of their posibilty nor
how to prevent them.
There is a need of serious scientific calculation of all or at least the
most grave injust possibilities.
If in faculties from the world are made such injusticies, then what
injusticies are made now at political level?
Who would be able to calculate all the possible political injusticies?
At least in principle, it is not imposible and progress is a question of
time and thinking-work.
It is very hard to know all that it happen on the planet at the most
lower/individual levels of society.
That is why we need to know all the posible injust actions and how to
prevent them, it is more economically and rationally.
Ü¥hÃÂ